Issue tracker
Linear tracks what you're building. Mimir figures out what you should build.
In Linear, your morning looks like this: you open your cycle, check what shipped yesterday, triage new bugs, and assign issues for the sprint. Linear is exceptional at this. The keyboard shortcuts are fast, the views are clean, and your engineering team loves it. But the issues in Linear had to come from somewhere — and for most teams, that somewhere is a PM writing tickets based on gut feel, a stakeholder request, or a Slack thread they half-remember.
In Mimir, the workflow that feeds Linear looks like this: you paste last week's customer interviews and support tickets, and Mimir produces ranked recommendations — each one backed by specific customer quotes and cross-referenced across sources. When you agree with a recommendation, Mimir generates a spec with implementation details that you can turn into a Linear issue. Your engineering team gets better-defined work because every ticket traces back to real customer evidence.
These tools are not competing. They are sequential. Mimir answers "what should we build?" and Linear answers "how do we track the work?" The teams that get the most from Linear are the ones that feed it well-defined, evidence-backed work — which is exactly what Mimir produces.
You have 30 issues in your Linear backlog and need to pick 8 for the next cycle. Some came from the CEO, some from support, some from engineers who noticed tech debt. You do not have a clear framework for which ones matter most to customers. Mimir can analyze your customer feedback and tell you which of those 30 issues actually align with what customers need — so your sprint is driven by evidence, not the loudest voice in Slack.
→ Mimir
Your team has bandwidth for one major feature this quarter. You have five candidates. Each one has a champion internally, but nobody has systematically looked at what customers actually need. Mimir reads your interviews and support data, ranks the options by customer evidence, and gives you the receipts to explain your decision to the team. Linear will track whichever feature you choose — but Mimir helps you choose the right one.
→ Mimir
Your product direction is clear, your roadmap is set, and your bottleneck is execution speed. You need an issue tracker that your team actually enjoys using, with fast keyboard shortcuts, clean sprint views, and GitHub integration. Linear is the best tool for this job. Mimir solves a different problem — figuring out what to build — and you have already solved that problem.
→ Linear
You do not switch from Linear to Mimir — you add Mimir before Linear. Start by running one analysis cycle on your recent customer feedback and compare Mimir's recommendations against your current backlog.
Use Mimir's generated specs to create better-defined Linear issues. Your engineering team will notice the difference in ticket quality.
Over time, make Mimir the entry point for new work: customer feedback goes into Mimir, recommendations become Linear issues, and every shipped feature traces back to evidence.
Linear is the best issue tracker on the market. It does not need replacing. What it needs is better inputs. Mimir provides those inputs by turning customer feedback into evidence-backed recommendations that become well-defined Linear issues.
Paste customer feedback and get ranked product recommendations in 60 seconds. No setup, no credit card.
Get started